No one really likes to be pigeon-holed but according to research produced by the Centre for High Performance, there are five different “types” of principal: the philosopher, the surgeon, the architect, the soldier and the accountant.
Philosophers are the largest group and these are inspiring leaders who like to talk about pedagogy. They try to lead by example as senior teachers and don’t see themselves as managers. They tend to leave the staff and students alone.
Surgeons are incisive and dramatic decision makers with a laser sharp focus who try to turn colleges around quickly by cutting and redirecting. These tough and disciplined principals show no mercy and waste no time introducing new rules, firing 1/10th of staff and excluding final-year students. They typically move the best lecturers to the final year, reduce class sizes and increase revision for quick wins.
Architects are scrupulous and careful planners with an eye for detail. They take a holistic, 360-degree view of the colleges, the community it serves and its role in society.
Soldiers focus on the bottom line by trimming back every ounce of fat and tightening the budget. These tenacious leaders like efficiency and order and drive down and cut costs to meet the college's budget constraints.
Accountants focus on the top line and try to increase the size of the college by recruiting more students as a way of improving the financial equilibrium. These resourceful and systematic types try to grow their colleges out of trouble. You might be a passionate wordsmith, a surgical mastermind, a creative financier or a tenacious cost-cutter but the research found out of the five leader types, only one had any real long-term impact…the architect. These visionary, unsung heroes are also the least rewarded because their grand designs take time to build and results aren’t instant.
Not my type
So who do you think you are? You might instantly recognise yourself as one of these or depending on your experience, you could well have been a different type of principal a few years ago. You could mix and match these types too depending on changing circumstances and contexts. Equally, you might not comfortably ‘fit’ into one of these categories at all and feel like you need to add another type of your own.
Whilst most principals might see a bit of themselves in these types, all such categories are just labels and they don’t necessarily represent everyone. Another piece of research categorises teachers into four main types in a similar way. ‘Why Teach?’ is a report by ‘Think and Action Tank’ LKMcowhich identifies four broad and overlapping kinds of teacher – idealists, practitioners, rationalists and moderates.
Principals and lecturers are an eclectic mix of personalities with their own identities – and they need to be too as they serve diverse college populations that don’t comfortably sit into neat boxes either.
As we avoid labelling students, we should be just as vigilant to avoid giving college leaders and their staff labels too because once made they can be hard to shift.
Unfortunately the only type of principals we have are stereotypes because we are too eager to put people in boxes and call them names.
What type of principal are you? You are you.
This article was originally published on eTeach.